Injuries sustained during maintenance – worker positioning

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 20 May 2021
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 14/21
  • 3 minute read

A member has noted several injuries in the last 6-8 months relating to worker positioning and the use of tools and equipment. A review of these incidents has established a need for improved risk assessments which consider the relationship between the worker, their environment, tools, and activity. We call this the ergonomics of the task.

What happened?

In two cases where hand tools were being used, injuries resulted from not fully identifying the impact from the combination of the worker position, work environment and the tools, which created ergonomic challenges.

A technician was working on a hydraulic fitting with two spanners when one spanner slipped and struck him in the face.  There was limited space available due to the position of the fitting.  Holding one spanner in his right hand, he was loosening the fitting with a spanner in his left hand which slipped and struck his forehead causing the injuries. He was wearing safety glasses at the time but the struck safety glasses injured the bridge of his nose.

In another case a technician was using a cutting shear to break M20 bolts. While doing so he felt a twinge on his shoulder but continued to complete his shift. Further medical assessment later confirmed a significant muscle tear requiring treatment and rehabilitation.

Injuries sustained during maintenance – worker positioning
Injuries sustained during maintenance – worker positioning

Actions

Work in the marine and offshore environment may require individuals to lift, stoop, kneel, twist, grip, stretch, reach overhead, or work in other awkward positions. 

In planning these activities, task risk assessments, pre-job planning and toolbox talks should consider and review the combination of ergonomic factors that could impact the task.

Our member provides the following examples as a guide to support and develop worksite task risk assessments and activities.

Type of control Example
Engineering Controls
Implement physical change to the workplace, which eliminates/reduces the hazard on the job/task
  • Use lifting equipment and reposition heavy objects to limit force exertion
  • Reduce the weight of a load to limit force exertion
  • Reposition to workshop where possible to eliminate a long/excessive reach and enable working in neutral postures
  • Select tools to enable neutral postures and reduce forces
Administrative and Work Practice Controls
Establish efficient processes or procedures
  • Require that where necessary and there are no alternative heavy loads are only lifted by two people to limit force exertion
  • Review workspace restrictions where equipment or fittings are located
  • Establish systems to minimise the duration of continual exertion, repetitive motions, and awkward postures. Rotate employees across tasks that use different muscle groups whenever practical
  • Properly inspect, maintain, and use power/hand tools
Personal Protective Equipment
Use protection to reduce exposure to ergonomics-related risk factors
  • Ensure “Top to Toe” assessment is made to review risk to work teams
  • Limit direct contact with hard, sharp, or vibrating surfaces
  • Wear approved PPE to help with grip, slip resistance, cold/hot conditions while maintaining the dexterity to operate tools and handle items easily

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.