Manhole opened and not correctly closed

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 6 July 2020
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 20/20
  • 2 minute read

What happened?

During a safety round on deck prior to cargo operations it was noticed that a manhole had been opened in order to pump out ballast water to replace a faulty valve.

During a safety round on deck prior to cargo operations it was noticed that a manhole had been opened in order to pump out ballast water to replace a faulty valve.

What went wrong?

The manhole cover or hatch nuts had been completely removed and the cover was only placed back on top and was left completely unsecured.

There was no barrier tape nor any warnings placed to indicate that the cover was open and unsecured.

Bypassing safety controls:

  • Crew did not follow company procedures.
  • No warnings were posted.
  • It did not occur to the crew doing this work to consider the potential risks of persons falling inside or slipping from standing on the manhole cover while so placed and not secure.

Actions

Members may wish to refer to:

  • LTI: step into open deck hatch causes fall [causal factor: the forward hatch was left open when the lifting operations started. There were no barriers around the hatch]
  • Near-miss: Open hatches left without barriers [10 hatches were left open for ventilation without any protection/control measures or any barriers for each hatch]
  • Near miss: engine room hatch left open without barriers [The hatch was not closed when not in use – if the hatch was required to be left open, suitable barricades and warning communication should have been in place]

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.