Unplanned deployment of free fall lifeboat

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 17 September 2018
  • Generated on 1 April 2026
  • IMCA SF 21/18
  • 3 minute read

On a vessel alongside there was an unplanned deployment of a free fall lifeboat (FFB), which no-one was aware of.

What happened?

There were no witnesses to the inadvertent launch, which occurred within a three-hour time window between 1500 and 1800 hrs.

A crew member noticed the boat in the water and investigation began. Crew boarded the lifeboat and it was found that the release hook was still in the locked position and safety pin was in position. Also, the master link in the hook was in good condition. It was not understood how it could have happened. The bow of the lifeboat sustained damage, coming from collision with a barge moored about 20m behind the vessel. The barge was undamaged.

There had been an inspection of the lifeboat earlier in the day but nothing unusual had been noticed. The inspection team did not enter the lifeboat as the maintenance hook was disabled, but no unusual hook configuration was noticed.

The vessel had in recent days come out of dry dock, when there had been an annual inspection of the lifeboat by the manufacturer. That inspection had included a check & test of the boat and the hook. At the end of the docking period, the FFB was placed back on the vessel. Thereafter, the vessel had a short (calm) sea voyage (1 day) to her next port.

Normal stowage position

Normal stowage position

Location after accidental release

Location after accidental release

Master link and maintenance hook after release

Master Link and maintenance hook (red painted) after release

Lifeboat retrieved back in cradle

Lifeboat retrieved back in cradle

Close up of connection

Close up of connection after retrieving back (maintenance hook applied for security)

Damage to the bow

Damage to the bow

What went wrong?

Investigation by both company safety professionals and by the manufacturer revealed no clear root cause or technical defects which might have contributed to the incident. The lifeboat was four years old and complied with all legislation and certification.

What were the causes?

By eliminating the technical failures or human intervention, the only possible explanation is that the master link was not properly placed on the release hook, and gradually slipped out of the hook over time.

What actions were taken?

  • Re-assessment and careful positioning of the master link when replacing the lifeboat.
  • Temporary downgrade of lifeboat safety certificate (fewer POB).
  • Assessment of risk for maintenance (securing) hook to be permanently on the lifeboat when the vessel was at sea (there was no objection from Class). However, it was decided not to do so. The reason for this was the risk following from a more complicated emergency procedure for the crew in emergency was considered too high.
  • The maintenance hook to be used always when in port, or during maintenance at sea.

Our member is not satisfied with the current root cause and brings this safety incident to the attention of all IMCA members.

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Sinking of tug Biter with loss of two lives

MAIB has published Accident Investigation 17/2024 relating to the girting and capsize of tug Biter with the loss of two lives.

Read more
Dropped object – strop parted over sharp edge

A cylinder was lifted to a height of approximately 6 metres over deck of the vessel, the sharp steel edges of the cylinder cut through the firehose protection and caused the strop to part.

Read more
Person injured when pry bar slipped

A crew member who was applying downward pressure to their pry bar to lift a track, fell towards the deck when the pry bar slipped.

Read more
MSF: High potential near miss during FRC maintenance

The Marine Safety Forum has published Safety Alert 26-01 relating to an incident where there was an unplanned lowering of an FRC to the sea

Read more
BSEE: Crane incident leads to serious facial injuries

BSEE has published Safety Alert 512 relating to a crane incident during well abandonment which led to a worker being struck and suffering serious facial injuries.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.