Serious injury during mooring operations: rope parted

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 24 October 2022
  • Generated on 21 February 2026
  • IMCA SF 23/22
  • 3 minute read

The Marine Safety Investigation Unit of Transport Malta has published Safety Investigation Report 10/21 into a serious injury which occurred during the mooring of a chemical tanker of 23000 tonnes on Malta. 

What happened?

At the aft mooring station, the mooring team noticed that one of the lines was tight, while the other was still slack.  Whilst trying to equalize the tension on both lines, the taut line parted and struck the third officer.  He suffered serious facial injuries and was transferred to a hospital ashore.

Aft, twin split drum mooring
Diagram of the accident

What went right

The crew involved, from the Master down to the ordinary seaman, were properly trained and experienced, and were appropriately rested at the time of the incident. The weather was calm. When the third officer was injured, other crew members took appropriate first response action. The report says that the injured person was “wearing a safety helmet, coveralls, leather gloves and safety shoes, all of which were in good condition.”

What went wrong?

  • A breaking test of the failed mooring rope, conducted after the accident, revealed that its strength had decreased by more than 50% of its certified MBL
    • The rope’s external and internal fibres may have deteriorated due to abrasion / friction and / or chemical contamination.
    • Stresses induced in the rope, due to internal friction and chaffing during this mooring operation, were contributory factors to this accident.
  • The mooring configuration deployed for this operation was not supported by the vessel’s mooring design – it is likely that it would have been difficult to apply, considering the heights and distances between the mooring equipment on the poop deck.
  • Crew members’ attention was shifted to another part of the mooring operation.
  • There may have been a breakdown in communication during the discussion on the mooring configuration.

What was done to prevent recurrence

  • Procedures and risk assessment
    • Amendment of procedures to include audit of mooring operations.
    • Amendment of generic risk assessment for mooring operations to emphasize clear communication procedures, minimum number of mooring team members required, and the importance of supervision and overview.
    • Amended company procedures to ensure that VDR data is also saved following similar accidents.
  • Equipment
    • Arranged to supply company vessels with better and safer mooring lines with “the latest snapback-arrestor technology”, and introduced a maximum lifetime of 5 years for mooring ropes.
    • Arranged to have one rope per ship tested for residual strength on an annual basis.
  • People and training
    • Conducted additional training for mooring operations fleetwide and also on inspection and maintenance of mooring ropes.
    • Introduced minimum crewing requirement for mooring.
    • Initiated and performed campaigns on safe mooring operations and introduced a ‘stop work authority’ programme.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Fall from height during mooring due to rope tension reaction

Rope became entangled with the propellor during mooring operations of a tanker causing the operator to lose balance and fall onto the lower platform.

Read more
Missing protection – progressive wear on hydraulic hoses causes damage

During an inspection, several hydraulic hoses and fuel hoses were found in direct contact with surrounding surfaces and sharp edges.

Read more
Small engine room fire – flammable object ignited

While ramping up the starboard main engine, a small flammable foreign object ignited.

Read more
Positive: damage to Fast Rescue Craft davit wire rope caught before failure

During routine checks, it was observed that the FRC davit wire rope had a visible fracture at the socket termination area.

Read more
BSEE: Miscommunication and trapped pressure causes injury during valve maintenance

BSEE has published Safety Alert 509 relating to a gas release incident on an offshore platform.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.