Serious injury during mooring operations: rope parted

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 24 October 2022
  • Generated on 8 November 2026
  • IMCA SF 23/22
  • 3 minute read

The Marine Safety Investigation Unit of Transport Malta has published Safety Investigation Report 10/21 into a serious injury which occurred during the mooring of a chemical tanker of 23000 tonnes on Malta. 

What happened?

At the aft mooring station, the mooring team noticed that one of the lines was tight, while the other was still slack.  Whilst trying to equalize the tension on both lines, the taut line parted and struck the third officer.  He suffered serious facial injuries and was transferred to a hospital ashore.

Aft, twin split drum mooring
Diagram of the accident

What went right

The crew involved, from the Master down to the ordinary seaman, were properly trained and experienced, and were appropriately rested at the time of the incident. The weather was calm. When the third officer was injured, other crew members took appropriate first response action. The report says that the injured person was “wearing a safety helmet, coveralls, leather gloves and safety shoes, all of which were in good condition.”

What went wrong?

  • A breaking test of the failed mooring rope, conducted after the accident, revealed that its strength had decreased by more than 50% of its certified MBL
    • The rope’s external and internal fibres may have deteriorated due to abrasion / friction and / or chemical contamination.
    • Stresses induced in the rope, due to internal friction and chaffing during this mooring operation, were contributory factors to this accident.
  • The mooring configuration deployed for this operation was not supported by the vessel’s mooring design – it is likely that it would have been difficult to apply, considering the heights and distances between the mooring equipment on the poop deck.
  • Crew members’ attention was shifted to another part of the mooring operation.
  • There may have been a breakdown in communication during the discussion on the mooring configuration.

What was done to prevent recurrence

  • Procedures and risk assessment
    • Amendment of procedures to include audit of mooring operations.
    • Amendment of generic risk assessment for mooring operations to emphasize clear communication procedures, minimum number of mooring team members required, and the importance of supervision and overview.
    • Amended company procedures to ensure that VDR data is also saved following similar accidents.
  • Equipment
    • Arranged to supply company vessels with better and safer mooring lines with “the latest snapback-arrestor technology”, and introduced a maximum lifetime of 5 years for mooring ropes.
    • Arranged to have one rope per ship tested for residual strength on an annual basis.
  • People and training
    • Conducted additional training for mooring operations fleetwide and also on inspection and maintenance of mooring ropes.
    • Introduced minimum crewing requirement for mooring.
    • Initiated and performed campaigns on safe mooring operations and introduced a ‘stop work authority’ programme.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Cyber-attack on vessel

An oil tanker suffered a cybersecurity incident.

Read more
MAIB: Normalising of unsafe practice – fatal man overboard incident

MAIB have published Accident Investigation Report 16/2026 into a fatal man overboard incident on board a bulk carrier offshore Sweden.

Read more
Dust explosion in Bow thruster motor

Upon activation of the bow thruster, there was a loud explosion within the forward section of the workboat.

Read more
Dropped bulk bag during loading operations

A dropped object incident occurred during quayside lifting when a bulk bag failed due to incorrect loading.

Read more
Failure of sea-fastening on the leg of a jack-up barge

During a sea passage, prevailing sea conditions caused a jack-up barge to experience rolling and pitching motions.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.