Thruster command and feedback differences
- DP Event
- Published on 2 November 2017
- Generated on 26 October 2026
- DPE 04/17
- 2 minute read
Incident
It was concluded that the fault had to be in the output control loop, and it was decided to replace items with spares held on board.
Comments
The DP system reported a thruster pitch prediction error when a large difference between the command and feedback was detected at 20:35:34. The description for a thruster prediction alarm states that the operator must take action to determine if the alarm is caused by a faulty feedback signal (DP performance nearly unaffected) or a faulty command signal (DP performance affected).
The port azimuth thruster was not stopped and only momentarily deselected from DP. The thruster gave thrust in the wrong direction while it was running and the DP system was unable to maintain position.
The prediction alarm went to normal again at 20:51:04 and the DP system was able to maintain position. No problems were reported after this.
Since the command output from the DP control system was correct, it was concluded that the fault had to be in the output control loop. It was decided to replace items in the command loop with spare parts held on board.
Trials and DP tests were carried out to verify system after replacement of parts. No problems or findings to report.
Considerations
- The reason for reselecting the errant thruster must be questioned.
- In this situation stopping the errant thruster should have allowed the DP system to regain control.
- Event box No.2 (pitch command and feedback mismatch indication) provides the trigger to stop the thruster because it indicates there is a problem with thruster commands.
Latest DP incidents
-
The domino effect
The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Lost in calibration
During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Watch what you are pressing
While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Drill Scenario
-
The UPS and downs
While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.