Dropped object during cable trans-spooling

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 29 August 2024
  • Generated on 24 July 2026
  • IMCA SF 17/24
  • 3 minute read

A roller weighing 5.7kg fell 8m and hit someone on the shoulder.

What happened?

This high potential incident occurred during alongside when a 69kV electrical cable was being trans-spooled ashore from a third party vessel. A connection bolt failed, allowing the roller to fall from a suspended Bow Cable Engine (BCE). On disconnection it dropped, first striking and being deflected by the BCE, before hitting the right shoulder of one of the subcontractor’s workers. The worker was underneath and close to the BCE as their task was to guide the cable as part of coiling it for storage. Work was stopped and the person injured was taken transported to external medical facility for assessment and X-rays. The X-rays revealed no breaks and the person injured was fortunately able to return to work.

Infographic on dropped object

What went wrong?

  • The injured person was working under a suspended load.
  • The company had a Safe Use of Work Equipment assessment process, which was not applied.
  • Existing risk assessments were inadequate. Additional measures to prevent dropped objects, such as secondary retention or cargo nets on the BCE, were not taken into account.
  • The cable had to be offloaded to shore because of last minute unavailability of a cable laying vessel (third party). This introduced the additional risks of double handling and a new work site scenario;
  • There was wax on the cable (this was a requirement from the client.)
    • The fact that there was wax on the cable had not been adequately communicated by the manufacturer. As a result the process and relevant task plans were inadequate to deal with the additional risks introduced by the wax.
    • The high ambient temperature at the work site caused the wax to melt.
    • The friction on the cable was affected by the wax. The melted wax prevented the BCE and its rollers from functioning properly.
  • There had been potential windows of opportunity to raise a “Management of Change” before the incident which may have identified further controls to address the excessive wax. These opportunities were missed.

Actions taken

  • Ensure effective application of the Management of Change (MoC) process to assess and manage the identified changes including identification and assessment of risks.
  • Be curious – keep questioning all aspects of what may go wrong. Take the time to go through all potential risks to consider and implement adequate mitigation controls.
  • Everyone should  feel able to stop the job, ask questions, assess, and only then, act.
  • Guard against becoming complacent by continually asking the question “what if …?”
  • Remember the wax that no-one had taken into account? Ensure better communications with relevant parties to ensure everyone involved understands what is being delivered before it arrives.

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Catastrophic engine failure and subsequent fire

MAIB has published Accident Investigation Report 10/2026 into a catastrophic failure of a diesel generator engine on board the vessel Kommandor Susan.

Read more
BSEE: Compressed gas cylinder hazards

BSEE has published Safety Alert 516, relating to potential risks involving compressed gas cylinders.

Read more
MSF: dropped object inside vessel tank

MSF have published Safety Alert 26-05 relating to a tank cleaning machine coming lose and falling within a tank on a vessel.

Read more
Uncontrolled movement of cargo

During offshore cargo operations alongside a rig, a single pipe loaded on deck shifted due to vessel motion and swell conditions.

Read more
Positives – rubber seals on hatches, securing of shackle pins, fuel sample box

A Member reports a few positive findings.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.