DP event investigation and testing inside the 500m zone

  • DP Event
  • Published on 29 March 2017
  • Generated on 10 November 2026
  • DPE 01/17
  • 1 minute read

Incident

The vessel should have proceeded out of the 500m zone to a safe area prior to investigating the fault and conducting tests.

DPE 17.01 – DP event investigation and testing inside the 500m zone – DP Incident – Flowchart

Comments

The report concluded that the vessel should have proceeded out of the 500m zone to a safe area prior to investigating the fault and conducting tests.

Considerations

  • There is no doubt that in circumstances such as this, where investigation and testing is required following a DP event, it should be conducted in a safe location and as a minimum outside the 500m zone.
  • The DP system’s level of redundancy always needs to be considered during investigation and testing.
  • It is not evident from the report, but it is wondered whether complacency contributed to this bad practice.
  • The original reported DP alarm should have resulted in a DP yellow alert.
  • The vessel might have considered using the independent joystick (IJS) rather than individual levers.
  • Emergency handling of the vessel should be practised on a regular basis.

Latest DP incidents

  • Watch what you are pressing

    While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician

    DPE 03/26

    19 October 2026

    Incident

  • The domino effect

    The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation

    DPE 03/26

    19 October 2026

    Incident

  • Lost in calibration

    During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm

    DPE 03/26

    19 October 2026

    Incident

  • The UPS and downs

    While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.

    DPE 03/26

    19 October 2026

    Incident

  • DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3

    DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3

    DPE 03/26

    19 October 2026

    Drill Scenario

The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.

We may use anonymised cookies for some functionality on this site. With your consent, we would also like to use tracking to improve our online offering. Find out more.