Near-miss: Rigging recovered with missing nut from tri-plate shackle

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 27 June 2016
  • Generated on 2 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 16/16
  • 3 minute read

A member has reported an incident in which rigging was recovered to deck with missing parts.

What happened?

The incident occurred when a rigging composed of two tri-plates was recovered to the vessel deck, and crew noticed that a nut was missing from one of the shackles. The installation rigging included two tri-plates, one in the lower section of the rigging arrangement just above the suction pile, and the second one on the upper end of the rigging arrangement connected to the crane’s auxiliary block. The shackle from which the nut was missing was one of the three installed in the upper tri-plate which was used to transfer the pile from the crane auxiliary block to the Abandonment & Recovery (A&R) winch when lowering the pile to the seabed.

Cotter pins

Cotter pins (split pins) not spread open as they ought to be. These pins were loose and could be moved back and forth easily

Upper and lower tri plates

Cotter pins (split pins) not spread open as they ought to be. These pins were loose and could be moved back and forth easily

Cotter pins

Cotter pins (split pins) not spread open as they ought to be. These pins were loose and could be moved back and forth easily

Cotter pins

Cotter pins (split pins) not spread open as they ought to be. These pins were loose and could be moved back and forth easily

Our member's investigation noted the following:

  • The cotter pin (split pin) was incorrectly installed (not opened out enough)
  • There was no thorough visual inspection of tri-plate shackles by rigging crews (onshore or offshore).
  • The tri-plate was secured on deck with shackles facing downward.
  • The pre-sail-away checklist did not include checks of tri-plate shackles.
  • The offshore rigging crew were unaware of observation following previous pile installation.
  • There was a lack of training of onshore rigging team provided for barge mobilisation.

The following root causes were identified:

  • Environment – rigging arrangement not allowing straightforward inspection of cotter pins.
  • People – lack of communication between onshore/offshore and project/vessel teams. Onshore project team were aware of the prior observance of a similar hazard. A presentation was developed and meeting held on shore but no evidence could be found that it was ever shared with the teams on board the vessel.
  • People – lack of attention/due care/poor work practice. Lack of pre-lift check of shackles by riggers, and failure to fully check rigging prior to barge sail-away.
  • Organisation – failure to vet the onshore rigging team supplied by co-contractor’s subcontractor.

Our member took the following actions:

  • Inspection of all rigging arrangements on the other piles.
  • Reviewed pre-sail-away checklist and integrated into it all specific checks such as nuts and securing cotter pins.
  • Updated the risk assessment and lift plan to reflect the hazards of missing/incorrectly installed pins in shackles.
  • Onshore and offshore riggers to check thoroughly the presence of securing cotter pins after installation and before lifting operations.
  • Project team to ensure that subcontractor’s rigging teams are properly vetted for competency prior to future barge mobilisations.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.