Surface decompression near-miss

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 31 May 2022
  • Generated on 11 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 13/22
  • 2 minute read

Following a SURDO2 42msw/40min dive, the depth of the chamber was unintentionally decreased from 12msw to 5msw.

What happened?

During surface decompression, following a SURDO2 42msw/40min dive, the depth of the chamber was unintentionally decreased from 12msw to 5msw forty minutes into the decompression. Immediately after this was discovered,  Treatment Table 5 was initiated. The divers did not present any symptoms before, during or after the incident.

Modification of panel

Modification of panel

Depth 12msw, all good

Depth 12msw, all good

Depth less than 12msw, visual alarm

Depth less than 12msw, visual alarm

Exhaust valve open, visual and audible alarm

Exhaust valve open, visual and audible alarm

What was the cause?

Investigation concluded that the two main causes of the failure were:

Corrective action/lessons learned:

  • The root cause was the dive supervisor running the decompression, without anyone supervising him (no human second barrier).
  • Procedures/manuals were updated to highlight that a diver runs the chamber during decompression, and the dive supervisor controls the diver.
  • The chamber panel was modified with a visual and non-mutable alarm for the venting.
  • A visual alarm showing depth shallower than 12msw, and an additional camera for the SUPV to see the DDC chamber readings was installed.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.