Staphylococcal infection in deep water saturation dive to 200 metres

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 June 2004
  • Generated on 1 April 2026
  • IMCA SF 05/04
  • 2 minute read

A Member has reported the following infection during a deepwater saturation dive. 

What happened?

Nine divers were stored at 170 metres (557 feet) in the chambers, and were working at a bottom depth of approximately 200 metres (656 feet).

Staphylococcus infected six members of saturation dive team onboard the vessel and one more during decompression. One of the diver’s infection was quite severe and, at one point, affected his gallbladder and/or other organs (the liver or kidneys), due to the antibiotics prescribed.

It is likely that there was an index case from whom others contracted the infection. The index case could have entered the chamber complex with an active staphylococcus infection or developed an infection in the complex. The location of the rash suggests that minor skin damage from the dive helmet or more likely oral-nasal mask and chin-pad provided a suitable location for the development of the infection. The infection spread readily from the index case through the chamber atmosphere, from person to person or via commonly-used equipment or bedding. Why all the divers were not infected is a matter of chance and it is very possible that they would all have been infected, given time.

The member involved has identified the following reasons as to why the infection spread from one diver to another?

  • Nine divers were living in one chamber.
  • There was an insufficient number of chambers to allow isolation and decompression of infected divers.
  • Using Tego 2000 as a hat wash may have caused the skin around their divers’ chin and upper lip to become irritated, causing the skin to ‘break’ and lose its defensive ability to shield against bacteria.
  • The helmets were not rotated out of saturation on a regular basis.
  • Surface support did not fully know the extent of the diver’s infection as it was spreading.
  • Humidity levels were high in the nine-man living chamber.
  • There had not been enough KM17C chin pads available for each diver to have his own.
  • At 200 msw divers are easily tired and immunity levels can quickly decrease.
  • Chamber hygiene was difficult to maintain due to nine divers living in the same chamber.
  • Divers’ personal hygiene had not been monitored closely enough.
  • Pre-saturation medicals had not been stringent enough.
  • There was high TVC in the potable water system.

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Sinking of tug Biter with loss of two lives

MAIB has published Accident Investigation 17/2024 relating to the girting and capsize of tug Biter with the loss of two lives.

Read more
Dropped object – strop parted over sharp edge

A cylinder was lifted to a height of approximately 6 metres over deck of the vessel, the sharp steel edges of the cylinder cut through the firehose protection and caused the strop to part.

Read more
Person injured when pry bar slipped

A crew member who was applying downward pressure to their pry bar to lift a track, fell towards the deck when the pry bar slipped.

Read more
MSF: High potential near miss during FRC maintenance

The Marine Safety Forum has published Safety Alert 26-01 relating to an incident where there was an unplanned lowering of an FRC to the sea

Read more
BSEE: Crane incident leads to serious facial injuries

BSEE has published Safety Alert 512 relating to a crane incident during well abandonment which led to a worker being struck and suffering serious facial injuries.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.