LTI: burns to forearms
- Safety Flash
- Published on 30 November 2022
- Generated on 27 August 2025
- IMCA SF 27/22
- 2 minute read
During pipe coating application work at a third-party sub-contractor worksite, a worker received serious burns to both forearms, that resulted in an LTI.
What happened?
The injury occurred at the start of the operation when the pipe was being coated with the first layer. During this operation the transition between pipes required the manual application of a spatula to mark the pipe cutting area, as shown below. While marking the pipe, the injured person’s arm touched the pipe due to an unexpected movement of the pipe assembly, causing serious burns to both forearms. This injury was seen by another employee who activated the line emergency stop and helped the injured person away from the line of fire situation to a safe place. First aid was given before the casualty was taken to hospital for further treatment.
Re-enactment of task (spatula)
CCTV footage of the task being undertaken by the injured person.
What went wrong?
The final investigation is still to be released, but preliminary findings from this incident and other recent third-party incidents have identified the following issues:
- The task was deemed to require manual intervention using a spatula as a marking tool, thus exposing people to possible injuries.
- The task was seen as routine, to be undertaken on a regular basis. There was no challenge to re-engineer the task by those performing it or supervising it.
- There was no consideration of hierarchy of risk controls, or specifically automated or engineered methods to eliminate human exposure.
- Company management had paid a visit and had previously identified the risks associated with the task and provided improvement suggestions to the sub-contractor.
Recommendations
- Ensure that the obligation and expectation to exercise the stop work authority is clearly communicated and understood by all, particularly third-party and sub-contract personnel.
- Can we do the job in a safer way? Ensure we have clear expectations in respect of controlling risk and identifying tasks that can be reengineered to remove the risk of human intervention or manual handling.
- Dare to challenge the “norm” with a fresh set of eyes as to how tasks are actually being conducted.
Our member notes an increasing need to improve human factors, risk perception and competency considerations for personnel involved in third-party operations. Our members’ analysis of their own “top 20” incident causes to date in 2022 confirms that inadequate engineering/design and use of tools and equipment are within the top 5 causes of incidents.
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 22/22
3 October 2022
-
IMCA SF 05/06
30 April 2006
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.